![]() During the Hogan trial, a Gawker editor was asked about attitudes on “revenge porn.” But the tough issues surely go beyond nudity and sex. In the digital age, with drones in the sky and biometric-collecting devices on the ground, the issue of ensuring privacy for citizens will surely cause lawmakers and courts to grapple with the boundaries of free speech. Then again, as seen by the Sony hack, news organizations confront all types of objections on privacy grounds. The Hogan case is also, in the words of George Freeman, the executive director of the Media Law Resource Center, one that addresses “an unusual and extremely private matter.” That is, a sex tape. ![]() Many First Amendment scholars will point out that this was merely a trial verdict, one that might not survive Gawker’s promised appellate review. Should the press now be concerned about what went down in a Florida courtroom at Hulk Hogan’s trial? Vopper (the right to broadcast illegally recorded communications), media outlets have operated with an air of confidence on materials determined to be in the public interest. ![]() United States (the right to publish classified information) and Bartnicki v. Sullivan (concerning libel of public figures), New York Times v. For decades, thanks to favorable legal decisions such as New York Times v. Cedric Gervais Recruits Wrestler Hulk Hogan and Nightlife Kingpin David Grutman For Groovy 'Do It…Ī Florida jury’s $115 million verdict against Gawker on Friday - with punitive damages still to be assessed - compels an examination into what sort of precedent this sets.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |